Debate Central

Other NCPA Websites

About SupportA National Center for Policy Analysis Project
Debate Central One Stop Shop for Debate Issues
Detainment : Indefinite detention-Pro
Rejecting the All-or-Nothing Approach in the Guantanamo Detainee Cases Added: 27-Apr-2005 \| Hits: 523 Rating: 0 Votes: 0 The basic problem with the detainees' argument in the Rasul and Al Odah cases is that they leads to perverse consequences. To see why, suppose the Court rules that Guantanamo is U.S. territory, so that the writ of habeas corpus is available there. Even given such a ruling, government could still easily hold enemy combatants in custody without access to judicial review. Rate It!
What's New \| What's Cool \| Top Rated \| Random Link \| Search
The NCPA is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public policy organization. We depend entirely on the financial support of individuals, corporations and foundations that believe in private sector solutions to public policy problems. 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 Phone: (972) 386-6272 \| Fax: (972) 386-0924 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 Phone: (202) 220-3082 \| Fax (202) 220-3096 Copyright � 2005 National Center for Policy Analysis All rights reserved - Privacy Policy