How to Submit:

To submit your case, simply send it as an attached Word Document (.doc or .docx format) to Rachel (dot) Stevens (at) ncpa (dot) org. We use a variety of features in Microsoft Word to review your document and suggest changes.

Once your critique is submitted, just wait! We’ll have it back to you as quickly as possible.


 

When will my critique be complete?:

We strive to complete all case critiques within 3 business days after their submission. (Please note that “business days” means Monday-Friday, 8am-5pm (CT), excluding holidays. )

Want to know when your case critique will be ready based on when you submitted it? Here is a chart.

Because of a number of factors, we cannot absolutely guarantee a 3-day turnaround. This is particularly true in the week before very major tournaments, the several days following holidays, or any other time when backlogs are very likely to develop.

If you need your critique before a certain deadline, you should ideally submit it a week or more in advance. If that is impossible, you may flag your request as “urgent” and specify your deadline, and we’ll do what we can to meet your needs. Please do not label requests “urgent” unless they truly are. 

 


 

FAQ:

Who is eligible for a free case critique?

Anyone! Debate Central makes this service to all LD, CX, and PF debaters in any local or national league. Wherever you debate, whatever style you use, we want to ensure that your hard work receives high-quality feedback that keeps you winning debates!

Who does the case critiques?

Debate Central uses a team of PF, LD, and CX experts on a rotating basis, but most of our critiques are done by Debate Central’s permanent staff, including NCPA Director of Youth Programs and Debate Central administrator Rachel Stevens.

Rachel has over a decade of experience in high school and college debate, and has competed in and/or coached every event. Her past students have achieved a variety of competitive successes, including State champions and finalists, top-10 appearances at NSDA Nationals, TOC bids, and more.

How many cases can I send?

As many as you want! Many students use our service several times a month. We’re happy to read several of your drafts and give comments as you edit.

 

Please note, however, that you are likely to experience a longer-than-average wait time for return if you submit more than 2 cases at the same time.

Do I need to do anything in return?

Technically, no, but we’d really appreciate a ‘like’ or a ‘follow!’ Debate Central offers this service to anyone who wants or needs it with absolutely no catch. You will receive your critique no matter what you do.

Debate Central is a non-profit service, so we depend entirely on donor support. If you would like to contribute to our efforts, you can make a donation here.

And don’t forget to tell your friends about us!

Are they confidential?

Yes. We guarantee it. Debate Central experts understand how hard you work to produce original research, and we would never share your work with anyone else. We do not publish or share even basic details about your cases.

Will you cut cards for me?

Occasionally, we may include a piece of evidence as an example or place an impact in one of your contentions if we have one. If you ask us for cards and we have them on hand, we usually have no problem sharing.

That said, the purpose of case critiques is to build your confidence and help you with search terms and research skills so that you can solve these problems yourself now and in the future. We’re happy to suggest sources and search terms to help you find what you’re looking for and help you over research hurdles if you aren’t finding it!

A big part of debate is learning research, so we want to make sure you’re getting all those benefits. We wouldn’t be helping if we always just gave you the answer!

Will you review the entire file?

Generally, no. We’ll review your shells and whatever you read in the first constructive. We can also take a look at blocks, but we can’t do a comprehensive edit of an entire file for time reasons.

Experts usually suggest research priorities within your case critique, however, and we’re happy to glance at your index to see if you’re missing anything.

Will you review other things, such as school papers?

In general, no. This service is intended to help high school competitive debaters with argument theory and criticism. Editing term papers falls outside of our intended mission and likely would not be appreciated by your teachers! Please do not send anything that you will submit for a formal grade, as helping you may go against school or teacher policy.

We will help refine cases for your school debate class, if you would like.

Can I request a rush order?

We’ll try to accommodate you whenever possible, but the best thing you can do to ensure that you get your case critique by competition day is send it a week beforehand. We get a high volume of these daily and not only do we want to give them the time they deserve; we also want to be sure to answer them in the order they were received.

If you’d like us to try to finish yours by a given time, we can’t guarantee it, but we can suggest the following: If you’d like it faster, specify that you’d like an urgent, basic review. This means our experts will give your case a once-over and point out any large issues but won’t take the time to do a full critique.

Think of it this way – it’s a great reason to get your first draft done early!

Can I ask follow-up questions?

Of course! If anything we say in a critique is unclear to you, you’re confused about how to execute something, or you don’t understand the strategy behind our suggestions, please feel free to reply to the critique email and ask. We are here to help, and are always happy to clarify. In fact, if you want, you can even send us questions without submitting a case.

I just got my critique! I don’t see any comments! What happened?

Make sure that you’re viewing the document in its draft view with comments visible. If you still don’t see the comments in the margins, please let us know! We’re happy to send you a PDF file.

I sent my critique and it’s been a week. I don’t have it yet. What happened?

Several things are possible. Most generally, it’s possible that we just didn’t get it. Please send it again to make sure we have it.

It’s also possible that you caught us during a holiday. Debate Central operates out of the NCPA office, which is closed for all major holidays. If you’ve sent something during a holiday week and haven’t heard back, be patient. We’ll get back to you soon! We’re seldom out for more than a day or so.

May I use Debate Central resources in my case?

We encourage you to use our topic analyses to build your case — that’s the reason why we write them! They are not meant, however, as stand-alone cases to use in a debate without doing any additional work because they’re simply not formatted that way and do not represent your own original work. Use them as a starting point, use the evidence if you like it, look up the articles for further reading, and even print it to use as notes in debate class!

If you’re going to quote our analysis (not the evidence portion but the explanations that follow) word-for-word, though, please cite us just as you would any other author. We want to get you started, but as we said above, we’re no help in the long run if we’re doing your job for you!

If you’d like to use them, the citation is:

Rachel Stevens, et. al., [DATE] [“[Title of Analysis],” Director of Youth Programs for the NCPA, Debate Central Free Resources, debate-central.ncpa.org]

 

65 Comments

  1. Ernest says:

    That the media is to blame for conflict in Ghana. Speak FOR or AGAINST the motion

  2. Anon says:

    I sent an email for PF March Topic, i have not gotten a confirmation yet, how will I know if and when you recieved my case?

  3. Josh Walker says:

    do you have any ideas for a debate on “our myths have got it all wrong”? I am on the affirmative team.

  4. rechal says:

    my topic is “peer group”.

  5. akeel says:

    Should children under the age of 18 be tried in cort and be punished like adults

  6. pupul lama says:

    education once considered a 3 legged tool comprising of academics,arts and sports are the key to the complete development of a child. now technology,unbridled ambitions for success, better jobs and consumerism have made the education system one tracked, putting sports and arts on the back track.

  7. […] Need more reassurance? You can always get a second opinion on your cases and files with the free case critiques at DebateCentral. And don’t be afraid to ask for help and advice, not all of it will be good, but […]

  8. […] Need more reassurance? You can always get a second opinion on your cases and files with the free case critiques at DebateCentral. And don’t be afraid to ask for help and advice, not all of it will be good, […]

  9. […]  5. Use our free case critique service. Finally, take advantage of our free case critique service! We’ll give you our honest take on your arguments before you have to expose them to real-life feedback at tournaments. For more information on how to use them, check out our FAQ here. […]

  10. ara says:

    films are not a reflection of th society

  11. ara says:

    films are not a reflection of the
    society

  12. […] Let us know how you use this card in the comments, and don’t forget to submit your case for a free case critique! […]

  13. […] Stay tuned for the negative side analysis, out later this week. And don’t forget to submit your case for a FREE case critique! […]

  14. […] us know what you think the best neg arguments are in the comments, and send us your case for a free case critique once it’s […]

  15. […] if you’re still not sure if you’ve got the hang out if, submit your cases for a FREE critique and we’ll help you find your weak […]

  16. […] After you read this and write an awesome pro case, send it to us for a free case critique! […]

  17. […] Finished your con case? Send it to us for a free case critique! […]

  18. […] Good luck, and don’t forget to send us your case for a free critique! […]

  19. […] this guide to produce an awesome pro case, and send it to us for a free critique when you’re done! Don’t forget to tell us what you think of this topic in the […]

  20. […] you’ve crafted an amazing con case, send it to us for a free critique from our debate […]

  21. […] forget to check out the rest of our free evidence, and submit your case for a case critique from our debate […]

  22. anon says:

    When will your February’s pro/con analysis be published?

  23. […] you’ve written your case, don’t forget to send it to us for a free critique from our experts! And tell us what you think of the new topic in the comments […]

  24. […] you’ve written your case, send it to our debate experts for a FREE case critique! And tell us what you think of the new topic in the comments […]

  25. […] Once you’ve finished writing your new affirmative case, send it to our experts for a free critique! […]

  26. […] wrote a case? Send it to us for free feedback from our debate […]

  27. […] How do you plan to use this card? Let us know in the comments! And don’t forget to send us your case for a free case critique. […]

  28. […] out later this week! And don’t forget that you can always send in your cases and receive a FREE critique from our debate […]

  29. […] After you write your cases for Nationals, don’t forget them to send them to us for a FREE, confidential case critique! […]

  30. […] When you finish your case, be sure to send it to us for a FREE, confidential case critique from our experts. […]

  31. […] After you write that awesome con case, be sure to send it to us for a FREE, confidential case critique from our experts. […]

  32. […] always, you can also always send your private questions and cases to us for quick, confidential, personalized feedback. If you email us, we’ll get back to you with a […]

  33. Johnb206 says:

    greatly appreciated.

  34. […] back! And, as always, don’t forget to submit your completed cases for a free, confidential case critique. We can usually return them to you within 3 business […]

  35. mahnoor says:

    burn all educational degrees for againist

  36. […] more help? Send us your case for a free, confidential, personalized […]

  37. […] should also take advantage of our FREE case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized critiques of your cases performed by our debate […]

  38. […] should also take advantage of our FREE case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized critiques of your cases performed by our debate […]

  39. […] should also take advantage of our FREE case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized critiques of your cases performed by our debate […]

  40. lysol says:

    my comment is this: should the analysis of pools include money? should the us put more dog parks in our pool?

  41. […] should also take advantage of our FREE case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized critiques of your cases performed by our debate […]

  42. […] should also take advantage of our FREE case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized critiques of your cases performed by our debate […]

  43. […] should also take advantage of our FREE case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized critiques of your cases performed by our debate […]

  44. […] should also take advantage of our FREE case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized critiques of your cases performed by our debate […]

  45. […] should also take advantage of our FREE debate case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized tips and feedback on your cases. Let our debate […]

  46. […] should also take advantage of our FREE case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized critiques of your cases performed by our debate […]

  47. Max says:

    I need help with my contentions for a speech. My topic is: limiting the freedom of expression of adults is justified by society’s interest in protecting children, and I am affirmative. I only have one contention, and that is: The media/society must censor specifc things as they are in best interest to not morally corrupt our children. If someone could give me two contentions that are not similar and that are on topic I would be so thankful.

    • Rachel Stevens says:

      Here are a few ideas for you:
      *Parents have a constitutional right to determine their children’s upbringing & education, which should not be trampled by the proliferation of objectionable content. (http://www.hslda.org/docs/nche/000000/00000075.asp)
      *Free speech is already subject to a number of limitations, when society deems the speech sufficiently dangerous. This is why you can’t threaten people, incite riots, or publish harmful false content about people (libel). So, the negative can’t claim that all speech should always be free, which means they have to win a unique case why this particular form of limitation is bad. They can’t win just by claiming all limitsations are bad, since we already all accept them in certain other occasions.
      *Adults are able to exercise judgement about what types of content they see, but children usually aren’t. Adults are free to seek out whatever they want, but they shouldn’t broadcast it publically where children might stumble upon it accidentally.
      *Childhood is a unique time in a person’s life, in which they are uniquely vulnerable, and traumatic events could have lasting effects that negatively impact them for years or perhaps even for their entire life. It is possible significantly hurt the rest of a person’s life by subjecting him/her to traumatic images or events during childhood. Therefore, because of the possible long-term permanent effects, it is uniquely critical to protect kids from dangerous content.

      In your existing contention, make sure you explain what “moral corruption means,” who gets to determine what is “moral,” and what kinds of bad things might occur if we allow children to become “corrupted.” This will help ensure the contention is strong.

  48. […] should also take advantage of our FREE debate case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized tips and feedback on your cases. Let our debate […]

  49. […] should also take advantage of our FREE case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized critiques of your cases performed by our debate […]

  50. […] should also take advantage of our FREE debate case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized tips and feedback on your cases. Let our debate […]

  51. […] should also take advantage of our FREE debate case critique service! We offer complete, confidential, personalized tips and feedback on your cases. Let our debate […]

  52. maggie says:

    i am a university student and we are given a topic to debate on which state “citizens should be allowed to own weapons”,my team and i are agreeing with the topic,can anyone help with the impact points

Leave a Comment

Acces Our Research

Health Care Policy
Tax Policy
Retirement Policy
Environment Policy

Learn More

About Us
Meet Our Experts
Meet Our Staff
Contact Us

Join the Conversation

Health Policy Blog
Economic Policy Blog
Retirement & Taxes Blog
Energy & Environment Blog

Get Involved

Attend
Subscribe
Sponsor
Donate

Follow Us

RSS
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

YouTube
Flickr
Helium


Copyright © 2011 National Center for Policy Analysis. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Sitemap