Our topic analysis of the November/December NFL Lincoln-Douglas topic, Resolved: The United States ought to guarantee universal health care for its citizens, can be found here.
We’ve just posted our analysis of the fall UIL Lincoln-Douglas topic,
Resolved: The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 50 (2010) ruling undermines democracy in the United States.
To wrap up our free evidence series, we have one more generic argument — this file, by Cross Examination Debate Association Champion Derek Ziegler, outlines another core controversy of this year’s topic: Federal vs. State action.
In keeping with our promise to post more free evidence at 100 “Likes” on Facebook, we have a new file to post! Today’s evidence packet, written by University of Texas at Dallas’ Director of Debate Scott Herndon, is a spending disadvantage — you can find the file below:
Hi, debaters! We didn’t forget about the Cross-Examination Topic just because we’ve been spending so much time on Lincoln-Douglas and Public Forum. Our debate expert, assistant director of debate at North Texas Louie Petit, has written you a high speed rail affirmative and a negative file.
Health Care Policy
Tax Policy
Retirement Policy
Environment Policy
Health Policy Blog
Economic Policy Blog
Retirement & Taxes Blog
Energy & Environment Blog