Public Forum debaters will spend March 2016 addressing a resolution asking them to consider whether the United States should withdraw its military presence from the Japanese island of Okinawa.
International relations resolutions are always especially tricky, due to their inclusion of a variety of complex interests. Not to worry, though, because we’re going to help you write the best possible cases for both sides, using this free guide!
Our topic analysis contains tons of free evidence for both pro and con, plenty of strategic tips from our experts, and a full breakdown of the March PF resolution,
This year’s Young Patriots Essay Contest received a record-breaking number of entries, with more than 960 students from around the country participating. The quality of these essays was incredible!
After much deliberation, our judges have selected three winning submissions to receive $9,000 in scholarship prizes.
Was your essay one of the winners? Find out!
The Public Forum debate resolution for February 2016 asks debaters to consider whether or not the United States federal government should combat climate change by implementing a tax on carbon emissions.
This is a challenging topic filled with complex scientific, technical, and legal considerations. That’s why we’ve prepared this free guide to help you write your best cases yet!
Our topic analysis contains tons of free evidence for both pro and con, plenty of strategic tips from our experts, and a full breakdown of the February PF resolution, “Resolved: The United States federal government should adopt a carbon tax.”
Get it now!
Check out our GIANT, complete guide to the current Lincoln-Douglas debate resolution: “Resolved: In the United States, private ownership of handguns ought to be banned.”
We can help you make your U.S. handgun ban cases your best ever, with nearly 100 free pages covering strategies, tips, and tons of evidence for both the affirmative and negative sides of the debate!
Start winning more LD debates now! Find our topic analysis below the fold.
Public Forum debaters will begin 2016 by debating a new resolution over the success of US and EU economic sanctions against Russia. Have these measures reduced Russia’s threat to Western interests, or not?
Debate Central wants to help all debaters write better cases, which is why we’ve prepared our complete, free introduction to debating both sides the Russia sanctions resolution!
Our topic analysis contains tons of free evidence for both pro and con, plenty of strategic tips, and a full breakdown of what you can expect from the January PF resolution, “Resolved: On balance, economic sanctions are reducing the threat Russia poses to Western interests.”
Get it below the fold!
We just released our complete guide to the current Lincoln-Douglas debate resolution: “Resolved: In the United States criminal justice system, jury nullification ought to be used in the face of perceived injustice.” We will break the jury nullification topic down for you, covering strategies, tips, and tons of evidence for both the affirmative and negative sides of the debate!
Need tips and evidence to help make your Public Forum debate case as strong as it can be? Look no further! Below the fold you’ll find our breakdown analysis of the current migrant crisis PF debate topic, “Resolved: In response to the current crisis, a government should prioritize the humanitarian needs of refugees over its national interests.”