Public forum debaters, here’s our guide to debating¬†the con side of the¬†January PF resolution, “Resolved: Development assistance should be prioritized over military aid in the Sahel region of Africa.” In it, you’ll find an introduction to the topic, discussion of debate strategy, and plenty of free evidence to get you started building your case. Find it below.

 

PF January 2014 Con Guide

 

After you’ve crafted an amazing con case, send it to us for a free critique from our debate experts!

 

What arguments do you think are best for the con on this topic? Tell us in the comments.

 

2 Comments

  1. Tony Carr says:

    You can catch a lot of teams on the definition of the Sahel, you have to use tje oecd definition according to the NFL. Also longterm effects is a decent framework but does anyone know of any others?

  2. Edris says:

    Exceptional post however , I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this topic?
    I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit more.
    Appreciate it!

Leave a Comment

Acces Our Research

Health Care Policy
Tax Policy
Retirement Policy
Environment Policy

Learn More

About Us
Meet Our Experts
Meet Our Staff
Contact Us

Join the Conversation

Health Policy Blog
Economic Policy Blog
Retirement & Taxes Blog
Energy & Environment Blog

Get Involved

Attend
Subscribe
Sponsor
Donate

Follow Us

RSS
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

YouTube
Flickr
Helium


Copyright © 2011 National Center for Policy Analysis. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Sitemap