woah interesting aff... How do they claim they are topical?

For the on case and commen K's you sould look on http://www.debatecoaches.org/openevidence/

9876543363 wrote:

the are some topics that i cant seem to find any GOOD neg stuff on can any 1 please help me? I need cards, topicallities, briefs, ks, sig., harms, inherencies ... the whole she-bang, anything and everything ... i would be willing to trade for them, and i have some good stuff.

Try original research- it never hurts to do so. I won't provide evidence, but i'll provide strats that you can base research off. I'll provide what my 2NR would most likely be and if you're interested in knowing a 1NC, I'll provide the rest of the strat.

9876543363 wrote:

abortion

Depends on the aff- if the aff rules on the grounds ofequal protection then PIC out of it and rule on the grounds of involuntary servitude with the net benefit being equal protection bad. Solves all the aff

9876543363 wrote:

child abuse

States CP+Politics

9876543363 wrote:

child care

States CP+Politics

9876543363 wrote:

energy assistance

Based off the aff i've seen- Multiplank CP (ADV CP out of warming and nuke subs CP to solve heg) + Politics

9876543363 wrote:

marrige promotion

Never heard of it- but i'm pretty sure states cp+politics would work.

9876543363 wrote:

school lunches

CP to have the 50 boards of education in each state end CAFO and have the surgeon general promote dietary foods+Politics

9876543363 wrote:

summer food programs

Never heard of it- States CP+Politics

ydocgnortsmra wrote:

ur strats are oh so diverse =P

And equally awful >.<, it takes an idiot to not see that TheProject is Christian.

No one else runs nuke subs, much less someone that it just HAPPENS to be their first post.

Enjoy your ban.

Last edited by BritainKennedy (Nov 2, 2009 6:39 pm)

invis3 wrote:

i dislike states heavily, it doesnt make a convincing arg, its too easy to attack, all you have to read is that the 50 states will not work simultaneously,

Wrong, wrong, and wrong.

invis3 wrote:

how so?

States Counterplans are obviously a much better way to solve than the aff. If you're talking about all 50 states acting in unison, there is actually literature on the issue.

That's the point... They don't do the "one size fits all" federal government plan text.. Making it solve better...

AndaPrime wrote:

BritainKennedy wrote:

invis3 wrote:

how so?

States Counterplans are obviously a much better way to solve than the aff. If you're talking about all 50 states acting in unison, there is actually literature on the issue.

No. Mainly because states don't even have Jurisdiction to do half of those cases.

I never said they could, just that if it's run at the proper times this year it's deadly. Especially with a good politics disad. Anyways, he was talking about the theoretical aspects of it, not necessarily the policy.

Last edited by BritainKennedy (Nov 9, 2009 12:17 pm)

AndaPrime wrote:

"Run at the proper times" does not equal "obviously a much better way to solve than the aff."

Yeah, it really does, it's assuming the neg team is competent.

AndaPrime wrote:

The point is, if a good chunk of the affs deal with gov't policies, the States won't be able to solve.

One word: Lopez...

AndaPrime wrote:

even theoretically the CP wouldn't be preferable if it's still a world where there's no jurisdiction over the plan.

We were talking about 50 state fiat bad theory, which is where this discussion started...

Last edited by BritainKennedy (Nov 9, 2009 6:43 pm)

$10 says this guy is lsu

He's not lsu lmao. He's cool.

...lol u gotta come get it though, im not going to arkansas for it