Debate Me!!!

by **Aaron100** » Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:28 am

Anyone, I really just wanna have a good ole' policy debate

No Dumb/Weird Cases please

by **BritainKennedy** » Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:54 pm

Kevin started a debate with you with the Baudrillard aff Aaron, what happened to that?

by **Aaron100** » Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:56 am

I told him I didnt wanna debate that case, and I guess he didnt want to post another one

by **Aaron100** » Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:20 am

CX-

1) Explain Spiritual Poverty in your words

2) Explain the warrents behind your T.S. Eliot, 1925 card, and its qualifications in the round

3) How does LSD solve for "spiritual poverty" as per your 1AC evidence?

4) Whats your definition on a social service?

5) How will you fund your plan?

6) Is mental illness your only advantage?

7) Whats your link to your democracy impacts?

How is a "journalism" piece written about a bunch of hippies by hippies who were high on LSD qualify as a solvency advocate? what are the qualifications behind that?

More to come

by **BritainKennedy** » Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:34 am

Oh, how you called my completely non squirrely aff dumb =, my bad.

by **Aaron100** » Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:43 am

nah i agree... but i just want to debate lol

answers to CX.... please

by **smasher164** » Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:26 pm

sorry Aaron, i am already debating britainkennedy. Plus hw. i hope u understand. no hard feelings, i don't feel like doing 2 debates at the same time or running this aff again. not that its bad or anything.

by **JamesTC** » Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:36 pm

Topicality > That affirmative.

by **Aaron100** » Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:52 am

JamesTC wrote:Topicality > That affirmative.

by **BritainKennedy** » Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:45 pm

Common sense > That affirmative

Debate Me!!!

Who is online