bigbear542 Aff v. ??? Neg

by **bigbear542** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:22 pm

ive debated plenty but not on v debate. ill go aff, anybody want to go neg?

by **K_Debater93** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:29 pm

yep, i'll take you on

by **BritainKennedy** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:33 pm

I'll judge

T - I know you're both better than this, don't use as a timesuck. I'm cool with it, give good standards and don't read the same standard texts to me over and over again, answer opponents standards.

K - Completely cool with it, my favorite argument. Just give an alt PLEASE. Know your kritik, be able to explain it, if you can’t explain it yourself, you don’t know it enough to run it.

DA – Obviously have the link/uniq/impact (with the exception of impact with a solvency mitigation....you all know the drill), if any aff wins any three, the DA is moot. Answer any offense on it before you kick it, you both know this.

Theory – It’s an uphill battle for the aff, but don’t let that keep you from running it! I will vote on it if it’s clear/cut abuse or if you obviously win the theory debate.

Conditionality – My stance is that the negative can have one/two conditional advocacies without having to really worry about theory, any more and prepare to debate it. Still though, my “uphill battle for the aff” applies.

I’m a true tab judge, debate Is about the students, so I’ll listen to anything you have to say. With that being said; I default to offense/defense, so give me good offense, I WILL go on presumption if I must... just please don't make me.

Both of you cool with me?

by **bigbear542** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:40 pm

im cool with debating Kdebater and britainkennedy as a judge

by **K_Debater93** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:41 pm

Same as the other round, yeah, you're good. 1nc will be up soon.

by **kylestockissues** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:42 pm

http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?dycy2w0ojmn

this is garretts aff

by **K_Debater93** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:43 pm

You wanna post here, or just email it?

EDIT: or Kyle could do that, lol

by **bigbear542** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:47 pm

lol yea kyle did it

by **BritainKennedy** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:49 pm

Okay now, is it safe for me to flow this and know it's not lsu? Lol.

by **bigbear542** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:52 pm

ive read threads where u guys discussed lsu. im not lsu if that's what ur askin

by **kylestockissues** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:54 pm

lol yea he is cool

by **BritainKennedy** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:55 pm

OMG IT'S HIM!!!! Haha jk, alright. I'll keep up

by **txtdnts** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:03 pm

I'll judge. I've gone like on a judging frenzy lately. XD

I'm basically tab, but will default to policy maker if there is no RFD debate given on both sides.

T - Love good T debate. Keep up your standards and voters throughout the round.

K and DA - Must have good impact calc.

Theory - Love it as well. . .

Condo Args - It's fine but I see running condo args as an easy target for the aff. One or two is okay.

Any questions?

by **BritainKennedy** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:05 pm

You stoleded my paradigm

by **K_Debater93** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:08 pm

yeah, lsu is that miguel_tejada guy. I know BigBear

Cross-x!

1. Why do immigrants carry more/worse diseases that citizens?
2. Who administers/enacts the plan?
3. How/is the plan funded?
4. Does Obama need to sign off on the plan?
5. What is the timeframe for plan solvency?
6. What's the internal link between healthcare and the economy?
7. What's the terminal impact to economy?
8. Will you defend your rhetoric as per the 1ac?

bigbear542 Aff v. ??? Neg

Who is online