2016-2017: U.S/China Engagement
Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its economic and/or diplomatic engagement with the People’s Republic of China.
• US/China Relations: Mixing Cooperation with Competition [NCPA Special Publication: Wednesday, December 28, 2016] by Doug Bandow.
There is no more important bilateral relationship than that between the United States and China. Yet the Congressional Research Service warns that ties have “become increasingly complex and often fraught with tension.” Relations appear likely to become even more fractious with the election of Donald Trump as president. Every four years the People’s Republic of China (PRC) becomes a presidential election issue, but Americans deserve a better explanation of the importance of U.S.-China political and economic relations than candidates’ sound-bytes.
Civil society institution are central to US/China engagement, and include international debate societies, educational associations, and thousands of international environmental, business, religious, and cultural associations.
These non-government organizations (NGOs), along with tens of thousands of international businesses operating in China, build personal and cultural connections between people and societies that are fully or partially independent of governments. (read more)
Nicholas Eberstadt in the Wall Street Journal (October 29, 2015), calls China’s population control policy: “The one-child mandate is the single greatest social-policy error in human history.”
The Chinese government’s draconian one-child policy followed soon after Mao Zedong’s death in 1976, and was a response to incredible poverty across China following decades of top-down economic planning.
The one-child policy created an utterly new social system for China, notes Eberstadt:
And China’s cities are now producing a new family type utterly unfamiliar to Chinese history: only children begotten by only children. They have no siblings, cousins, uncles or aunts, only ancestors (and perhaps, one day, descendants).
But many existing American manufacturing jobs depend heavily on access to a broad array of goods drawn from a global supply chain — fabrics, chemicals, electronics and other parts. Many of them come from China. At Mr. Reid’s factory, imports account for roughly two-thirds of the cost of making a recliner chair.
• Debate Central on February 2013 Public Forum Topic: “Resolved: On balance, the rise of China is beneficial to the interests of the United States.” And Part II (con).
Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its economic engagement toward Cuba, Mexico, or Venezuela.
More Debate Central Resources
Have questions about how to construct a case? We’re happy to provide free case critiques and advice!
This is a compilation of the evidence produced at summer debate institutes nationwide. This site is maintained by the generous work of volunteers at the National Debate Coaches Association (NDCA.)
This assembles the arguments read by hundreds of the nation’s best teams. Like Open Evidence, this site is maintained by the generous work of volunteers at the National Debate Coaches Association (NDCA.) If you are looking for arguments run by college debate teams that list is maintained here by Aaron Hardy of Whitman College.
Hundreds of squads throughout the country now read their evidence off of their computers instead of printing. While challenging, this process saves thousands in travel and printing costs.
The first link is to PaperlessDebate.com, a website run by Aaron Hardy of Whitman College. The second links to Debate Synergy, a software suite designed by Alex Gulakov of the University of Texas-Austin.
**NOTE — Both links contain hyperlinks to evidence templates. For a basic description of why a paperless debate template is useful in preparing evidence efficiently, please see Naveen Ramachandrappa’s work here.
If you’ve ever heard a debate term and wondered what it meant, look no further! This encyclopedia contains useful information compiled by expert debate coaches.